Young gay bloggers need to just stop writing

Disclaimer: this is a stock photo and is not meant to represent anybody in particular.

(this is a stock photo and is not meant to represent anybody in particular)

Why are young gay people so bad at writing? Why has it become the norm in our culture to accept the shallow, self-absorbed ramblings of young gay bloggers? When I look around gay websites, I see all of these trite over-generalizations about “10 mistakes gay men make when dating” and “why are gay men so shallow”. Young bloggers apparently don’t have enough experience to think outside of the box of their own narrow world-view. They don’t research, or ask for a variety of opinions on a subject. They don’t consider that the “gay experience” is extremely diverse, even if their own social circles are not. It is as though young gay bloggers think they are the first and only people to ever have thought about any given topic, and that their personal experiences speak for everyone.

Trite op-eds are killing our culture. I think it’s time to fight this trend of shallow, self-absorbed blogging. Luckily (insert triumphant music here) I can solve this problem by giving some advice to young gay bloggers: just stop writing. That’s right, just stop. Wait until you grow up, and learn a little about the world.

WHOAH, THERE! Hang on!

Back it up a bit, and let’s think about those opening paragraphs. If you’re a young gay blogger, you are probably a little offended. Hell, if you are a thoughtful human being of any kind you are probably offended: It’s condescending, it over-generalizes, and the advice that it gives is the height of arrogance.

But that, my friend, is exactly the point.

A few (but certainly not all) young gay bloggers really do have this problem. The most recent offender is Dalton Heinrich, who wrote Gay Men and the Curse of the Peter Pan Syndrome, in which he concludes that all gay men who are over 30 who go out to bars are sad, sad people who “need to grow up.” I deliberately mimicked many of his witty turns-of-phrase in my parody, just to give you a feel of what he sounds like.

He is being roundly lambasted by gay media, but in truth he is hardly alone. Gay op-ed culture regularly publishes what I call “self-involved op-ed”. These are articles where the author sits down and writes a reaction to something in his own personal life, based on his own experiences, but he writes about it as though it applies to all gay people, and as if nobody has ever written about it before.

He doesn’t research to find out what other people might have thought or said on the topic, because all that matters to him is expressing his feelings. He also doesn’t ask around or explore the possibility that gay people from different social circles might have totally different experiences from his: he is confident that his own “lived life” is sufficient to speak for the entire gay community.

Self-involved op-ed isn’t always bad. It can be entertaining enough, and can give insight into the world experienced by a particular individual. There is a problem, though, when the writer starts making grand claims about society at large based on nothing more than what he personally has experienced.

Not all young gay bloggers write self-involved op-ed, nor is all self-involved op-ed written by people who are young. And I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it is “killing our culture”… but I do think it’s a problem. It makes us settle for less than a thoughtful analysis.

What’s the alternative?

Heinrich has a legitimate point to make in his article. There are some older gay men who go out to the clubs because they are trapped in a pattern of behavior that is dysfunctional. For some of them, going out multiple times a week has kept them lonely their entire adults lives, and they are too scared to break out of it and explore other social options.

If Heinrich wants to write about that phenomenon, then by all means he should write about it.

But in exploring that issue, he may want to mention that there are plenty of older people who go out to the clubs who don’t fall into that category. Maybe he should talk to some of those people, and find out what they are doing right. He could also mention the fact that you don’t have to be over 30 to be a sad “Peter Pan”-er, and I’m sure he could find plenty of examples of that to interview as well.

He might be interested in exploring whether the same thing happens in the straight community. He might want to ask why it may be more prevalent among gay men than straight men. He could also research the extremely different cultural landscape that today’s “older gay men” grew up in, and how their more limited options for socializing when they were younger has impacted the way that they approach socializing later in life.

All of these are things that a solid, thoughtful, research-oriented opinion writer could do. It would really make a fantastic article, if Heinrich were interested in doing the work that would be required to write it.

So, what I meant to say is…

Alright, so let’s go back to those terrible opening paragraphs! That was parody and snark. What do I really want to say about “young gay bloggers”?

First, the problem of self-involved op-ed isn’t particularly a gay one. Sure, it may be more prevalent among minority bloggers, who often are desperately trying to find themselves and at the same time are so eager to set the world to right. But it exists everywhere in our culture: this is one of the consequences of the “democratization” of the internet. There is a perception that it takes no training or education to be a writer.

But fixing the problem begins with simple thoughtfulness. If you are “speaking your own truth”, then just write about your experiences: don’t pretend you understand or even know what “all gay people” or even “all young gay people” are like. Aim for a little more personal, and a little more humble, and it will do you a world of good.

On the other hand, if you really do want to make an observation or critique of the “gay community as a whole”, just take a second to see what other people have already said.  Read a little, research a little, and talk to people outside of your circle of friends. It will make your writing more interesting, and you just might learn something along the way.

4 views shared on this article. Join in...

  1. Very VERY interesting. But I have to ask Greg, Why should they NOT be writing what is relevant to their experience, lifestyle and priorities as they are growing up. They may not be writing what you and I might read (I hardly read because they are ‘gay’ bloggers or ‘straight’) but they have an audience and they have a purpose, may be not relevant to us but we are not the be-all and end-all of homosexual or wider community. Are we?

    I suppose, you have the right to not appreciate their work but what they should write or why they should write or not, is not your place or mine to decide, or demand. or Is it?

    • Greg Stevens says:


      My point wasn’t that people shouldn’t “write what they know” or write about their experiences, but rather that they shouldn’t write about their own experiences and then make sweeping broad generalizations about life, the gay community, or human beings based just on their own feelings, experiences, or social circle. I’m sorry if that wasn’t clear in the article — I did make a point, however, of spelling this out in the article.

      For example, I object to a young person (or any person, really.. although young people are disproportionately guilty of this) saying “gay people these days do such-and-such” when 1) they have not spent ANY time checking to see if what they’ve observed exists outside of their narrow social, 2) they have not spent ANY time thinking about whether their personal experiences with “gay people” may be limited to people in their own niche, their own socio-eceonomic group, their own race, or their own geographical area, 3) they say “these days” but haven’t given ANY thought or done ANY reading to see whether what they are talking about was also applicable to people in the past, or why it may or may not have been, and what the historical context of their observations is, 4) they haven’t even done any cursory examination to see what other people may have written on the same topic, to see if their view is consistent with or contrasts with other people’s views, or examined why their perception or opinions might be similar or different from others.

      That’s why I have so much disdain for the people I’m writing about. Not that they are speaking their own experiences: that is valuable, and good advice to give to any writer. It’s that they are being lazy, sloppy, unreflective and stupid in the manner in which they do it.

  2. Hotgayfantasy says:

    Just be aware that you need to improve and all. But don’t give up. Practice and improve your craft. 🙂

  3. Nick Cast says:

    Totally agree, dont stop writting