Greg Stevens 2015 in Hawaii
Greg Stevens 2014 Christmas
Greg Stevens 2014 October

Robot sex, gay nanobots, and synthetic lust: gender and sexuality in a transhumanist future

Greg Stevens and B.J. Murphy talk about the transhumanist future of sexuality and gender identity
I am a transhumanist: I really believe that eventually our technology will advance to the point where we are able to replace the biological parts of our brains and bodies with mechanical or artificial replicas, or will be able to "upload" our minds into machine bodies. But if humanity transitions to synthetic, non-biological bodies... what will that mean for sex and gender? What will it mean for sexual orientation? Do terms like "homosexual" and "heterosexual" even have meaning when our bodies are made of nanobots or plastic and wires?

By 2050, everything in your home will have been invented by Elon Musk (and you will love him for it)

Elon musk will have invented everything you think is important by 2050
Elon musk was a co-founder of PayPal, is the CEO of both electric-car manufacturer Tesla Motors and the spacecraft company SpaceX, and he is chairman of SolarCity. He's trying to make zero-emission electric cars widely available, launch spacecraft into orbit, invent the perfect battery, and create an effective solar-powered energy grid. These are incredibly broad "infrastructure-level" initiatives. Rather than throwing his power and money into inventing a gadget with his name on it that will appear in people's homes, he is building the services that eventually all of the gadgets you use will completely and utterly rely on. And you will look back at the fact that he used your tax money to do it, and you will thank him for it.

Seven examples structural sexism, some more useful than others

Structural Sexism and gender-based politeness
Invoking the label "structural sexism" is kind of like using The Force in Star Wars: it can be done for good, or it can be done for evil. It has a light side and a dark side. And a lot of people don't really understand what it means, and end up dismissing it or abusing it. This is going to be an attempt to clarify what the label "structural sexism" actually means, and give some examples of good applications of the term as well as some examples of ways the term can be horribly abused.

Hindutva: talking about India’s radical conservative party

Greg Stevens talks about Hindutva and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
Since 2014, the dominant political party in power in India has been the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is India's conservative right-wing party. They can be thought of as roughly the equivalent of the "Republicans" in the United States, just as the Indian National Congress is the rough equivalent of the "Democrats." But how right-wing are they? I did a recent "Unscripted Chit-Chat" video with an anonymous Indian guest to talk about BJP, and their connection to their radical nationalist group, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). My guest claimed that RSS is essentially India's equivalent of the KKK, which sparked quite a response!

When to celebrate my birthday (and also yours)

When to celebrate your birthday, by Greg Stevens
If you are like most people, you celebrate your birthday on the same calendar date each year. For example, since I was born on May 4th 1973, you probably consider today, May 4th 2015, to be my birthday. But this is extremely arbitrary and culturally biased: calendars vary from culture to culture, and change over history. Wouldn't it be nicer--both more objective and more natural--to celebrate the anniversary of your birth in a way that was more connected to the natural movements and rhythms of the earth and the universe?

The fallacy of incorrect scoping: manspreading, Muslim extremists, lying bitches, and gay sex fiends

The Fallacy of Incorrect Scoping
I have been dealing with a common and recurring logical problem that I see in cultural and political discussions, and it has come up often enough lately that I'd like to actually give it a label and a definition. I'm going to call it the "fallacy of incorrect scoping". I'm using the term "incorrect scoping" to refer to any time there is some trait X that is bad, and because that trait is correlated with group Y, people will identify it as a "Y problem" or as a "X&Y problem", even though the only thing that is actually causing the problem is X. It happens constantly in political and social debates, and it is completely and disgustingly wrong.

What do I say if I can’t say “black people”?

What to call black people instead of black people
Yesterday's episode of the Chris Krok radio show, a local Dallas conservative talk show, was entirely dedicated to the extreme anguish that Texans apparently feel when confronted with the question, "What do I call someone instead of 'black guy'?" Chris Krok spent a good 30+ minutes talking about this issue, and spoke with many listeners who called in to opine on the subject. And in that entire time, not a single person addressed the actual issue involved, or the way to solve it.

Trending Articles

About Me

I’m an ex-academic and research scientist who still writes about sciencey things for The Kernel, The Daily Dot, Second Nexus, and Me, Myself, and Robot. My writing has also appeared in Inside, The Week, The Good Men Project, Real Clear Technology, and I get involved in a lot of projects through Greg Stevens Holdings, LLC.

This blog is where I talk about all the things that interest me: science, philosophy, politics, religion, history, culture, fitness, and even some personal stuff.

Some of the other things I do include reading, fiction writing, drawing, making videos, traveling, working, playing… you know, the usual. Scroll down and you can see some of my creative work in the sidebar below.

Subscribe if you want to get email updates. Feel free to get me a present if you are inclined. And thanks for visiting!

Powered by WordPress Popup